Hazel Avenue Improvement Project
Skip Navigation
Overview
Get Involved
Public Meetings Notices
Public Meetings Summaries
Comment Form
Community Advisory Committee
Timeline
News
Project Alternatives
FAQ'S
Contact Us
Sacramento County Public Works Agency
     
   
     
  HOME  
 

HAZEL AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE No. 1
(July 25, 2000)
SUMMARY REPORT

Study Background and Description
Hazel Avenue is a four-lane corridor that runs through Sacramento County spanning over six miles from the Placer County line to Folsom Boulevard. The corridor provides a vital transportation link for local residential, business, and recreational areas. Currently, Hazel Avenue is one of only a few bridge crossings of the American River for commuter vehicles, trucks, pedestrians, and bicyclists. This crossing also affords access to the American River Parkway for joggers and equestrians.

The current mobility challenges on Hazel are expected to increase as the population and economy of the Sacramento County region continues to grow. The County believes it is imperative that steps are taken to alleviate both current and future mobility constraints for all stakeholders including adjacent property owners, local residents and business owners, commuters, industrial/cargo transporters, pedestrians, bicyclists, and other American River recreational users. With this in mind, the county has initiated the Hazel Avenue Corridor Study.

The purpose of the Hazel Avenue Corridor Study is to identify alternatives to address current and future challenges along the southern two-mile section of Hazel Avenue from Madison Avenue to Gold Country Boulevard. The study will focus on the best way to accommodate and serve all corridor users as well as the community in which this section of the corridor operates. Through the study, the County of Sacramento intends to accomplish four main goals:

  • Improve mobility through the corridor
  • Encourage a high level of community involvement
  • Provide aesthetic enhancements to the corridor
  • Address access to recreational facilities

Purpose of Public Open House
The Sacramento County Department of Transportation has implemented an extensive public participation program to drive the study. A major component of this program is the public open houses. The open houses are held to inform and update the surrounding community about the study. They also serve as an opportunity for the general public to become involved in the solution process by providing comments on the study’s issues and alternatives.

This document is a summary of the first public open house held on Tuesday, July 25, 2000. The focus of the open house was to present an overview of the study and to receive input from the public on the purpose and need for improvements along the Hazel Avenue Corridor.

Noticing for Public Open House
The County of Sacramento used several methods to notice the surrounding community and interest groups about the open house.

Newsletter: The study’s first newsletter was distributed to the entire study mailing list. The approximately 4,600-entry mailing list is comprised of adjacent and surrounding homeowners and renters, businesses, special interest groups, elected officials, government agencies and local media. The newsletter was mailed approximately two weeks prior to the open house and contained overview information on the study, as well as public participation program and open house details.

Press Packets: Press packets containing a media release, newsletter, and camera ready graphics were distributed to the following print, radio, and television outlets:

  • Sacramento Bee
    • News editor Linda Gonzales
    • Transportation reporter Emily Bazar
    • Transportation business reporter Clint Swett
    • Neighbors section editor Karen Yelton
  • Orangevale News
  • Sacramento News & Review News
  • Roseville Press-Tribune
  • KFBK-AM, 1530
  • KHTK-AM, 1140
  • KKTO-FM, 90.5
  • KCRA-TV, Channel 3
  • KMAX-TV, Channel 31
  • KQCA-TV, Channel 58
  • KTXL-TV, Channel 40
  • KVIE-TV, Channel 6
  • KXTV-TV, Channel 10

Display Ad: A display ad announcing the open house was printed in the Sacramento Bee Neighbors section on 7/13, in the Orangevale News on 7/20, and in the Roseville Press-Tribune on 7/12.

Web Site: (www.hazelavenue.org) A study Web site was developed and provided information on the study and the first public open house. Future meetings will also be posted on the Web site.

Signage/Information Line: The County posted two informational signs along the Hazel Avenue Corridor with the study’s information line number and web site address. The information line’s outgoing message notified the caller of the public open house time and location.

Report on Public Open House
The first Hazel Avenue Corridor Study Public Open House was held on Tuesday, July 25, 2000 at the VFW Post 6158 at 8990 Kruithof Way in Fair Oaks, California from 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. The location of the open house was right off of Hazel Avenue within the study area. Approximately 150 residents, business owners, media, government officials, Community Advisory Committee members, and other special interest representatives attended the open house. Also in attendance were 12 Study team members.

The open house was structured so that people could “drop-in” on an informal basis to review exhibits, speak with project team members directly, hear a short presentation and provide both written and verbal comments to staff. Each attendee was given a program outlining the exhibits a comment sheet to drop off or mail in, and a copy of the study newsletter.

The exhibits were placed in a circle around the room and covered the following study areas:

  • Study Description and Goals
  • Study Purpose and Issues
  • Potential Improvements
  • Public Involvement
  • Right of Way

A short ten-minute presentation was given at both 5:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Theron Roschen, the County’s Project Manager, and Ben Strumwasser, the Public Involvement Manager, introduced staff and gave an outline of the study and the purpose for the public open house.

A total of 31 written comments were submitted during and shortly after the open house. Those written comments, along with two e-mail comments, and verbal comments made to project team members during the open house, are summarized in Section III of this report.

Back to Navigation